• |
  • 極速報價
  • |
  • etnet專輯
    etnet專輯
  • 會員
  • 產品服務 / 串流版
  • 設定
過往專欄
心筆在妍
教材攻略。學得要精趣味投資法暢所欲妍HR唔易做辦公室政治論盡中港台時事要聞圖窮秘現中環人金錢世界呈分試 你要知小事大意義全城聚焦點政•漫料理NatFix我家私房菜素心Cook心理攻防戰綠路閑人好書看多點Pris形象教室形象UP!保哥快趣煮Green Monday看透生死親子語我要初創政策.正察跳躍中國時空筆記留心站財玄廣進點歷史看真點時勢造網紅Online有話兒DR-Max 一點就明Bella vita 美好生活iMoney 熱點Talk Of The Town活得健康點親子芬享不藥而癒人生燦爛點凱文隨筆尋寶島盛衰關鍵國金與投資留給囝囝IC理財打工秘笈樂活人生SME 解密「港」創業‧談管理心靈加油站「男」言之隱滾蛋吧,腫瘤花生味辦公室健康透視抗癌煮意知‧解醫學創業兵團匯對達人容我細說言歸政傳政經頑石不低頭為理發聲郎旋風薰香療法男士診症室抵玩自助遊句句有骨星座命理念力•氣功手機應用tips睛益求精嚴浩 LIKE!見微知著跟著陶冬找美食數碼潮人廣告有晴踏出退休第一步識食•惜食有種CEO叫做莊潮爆網事羅湖橋兩邊娛樂酷辣辣思歪思正十萬八千里樂本健‧教室特首選舉趣食60秒入廚101觀自然•觀香港有種生活政本清源心筆在妍維基解碼IT戰國誌煮酒論政今日趣聞馬壇.誌趣星期二周融愛瘋Apps美美道來大國崛起智醒日誌@中小企「營」刃而解Smart Buying甜品工房Education Calculator家事法庭升學信箱新手媽媽怪獸父母營營樂樂親子專題財富非常道謝國忠看勢獨唱團京城近觀原來如此乾坤挪移街坊食神Keyman森巴舞睇波LU文化導遊精神解碼抗癌兵團有營生活吾道崢廣見聞名家名畫商務英語型品薈我心中的米芝蓮歐洲直擊旅途中食得喜Leadership Coaching一哥教攝影心晴百態乳你同行專科專論人愛衣裝Word Discovery科技趨勢愛情故事投資達人政治擂台藝術投資秘笈抗癌點滴寵物情緣淘寶lization電影一線網絡鬼故主.管微博一分鐘管理娛樂有理進攻SAT古今名錶政‧經‧女人The Beauty Factor議會內外石油戰爭男女情色談金說匯風水環境學細味建築Green Hong Kong星光伴我行我吃過的米芝蓮A+孩子上海觀察京城札記鐵娘駕到食客三千創富新思維海外升學信箱Today's Web藝術投資世界在讀什麼-雷美華潮得起Business English飛越地球村紅酒情報職場物語股場琦手鑽石媒人Mei Ling好愛情‧壞愛情性治療師手記名牌女王嶺南人語醫美正當時黃金時代醫美正當時一份好工美麗不妥協上班纏下班逅

17/08/2016

情義法院

  兩年前佔中「衝擊廣場」案,涉事被告黃之鋒、周永康等一如所料,只被判社會服務令和緩刑,威水步出法院,用事實告訴大家,衝吧、擲吧、破壞吧,但大前提是要做領袖、做出頭鳥,有人識,你就有神功護體。

 

  這些年,相信很多市民已對法院的某些判決失望、對法治感到絕望,一宗又一宗的社會服務令,一次又一次的無罪釋放,當法律成了操控者的把戲,原來會比一個無法的社會更無天。

 

  從前我相信法官不看情、只閱法,甚至天真地以為法官連報紙都不看,免得判斷受外界的資訊左右,卻原來今日的法官不單有情,還有義。

 

  看香港東區裁判法院裁判官張天雁的判詞:「三人(指被告)均為年輕民主運動領袖,對政治滿腔熱誠……真心相信自己的政治理念而表達訴求,非為自己的利益或傷害他人……三人當時的理念是和平、理性、非暴力……(所以)除了要考慮被告的行為及引致的後果,亦要以寬容態度,了解他們違法背後的動機……年輕人可貴之處是純真,毋須顧及實際利益,但可能較衝動偏激,就如錢幣兩面,有美好一面及缺失一面……鑑於周永康已獲倫敦政治經濟學院取錄並計劃於九月到英國升學,若判處社會服務令,他實難以履行,考慮他的例外情況,判處緩刑代替。」

 

  看完,你相信這是法院嗎?還信法律是無私嗎?感人啊,我以為我走進了教堂,看了一幕神的寬恕。

 

  最後,只有一問:ISIS及所有恐怖主義行為,同是基於對理念的堅持;綁著炸彈來的,哪個不是純真年輕人?他們一樣不顧利益、一樣較為偏激,以此推論,看來世界也該寬恕他們,對不對?

 

轉載自: 晴報

 

 《經濟通》所刊的署名及/或不署名文章,相關內容屬作者個人意見,並不代表《經濟通》立場,《經濟通》所扮演的角色是提供一個自由言論平台。

etnet榮獲HKEX Awards 2024 「最佳證券數據供應商」大獎► 查看詳情

我要回應116

你可能感興趣

版主留言

我要回應

登入

發表回應

登記

成為新會員

回應只代表會員個人觀點,不代表經濟通立場

  • 只看作者回應
  • 查看全部回應
  • 順序
  • 倒序
  • hongkonger發表於 2016-8-19 06:45 PM
  • #116
  • Thanks for the advice, but I have to work today and have to miss watching this match, but I will not miss the Final.
    And I will definitely not miss the familiar National Anthem playing again in the stadium.

  • 引用 #106 路人乙 發表於 2016-8-19 11:27 AM

    回覆 hongkonger 睇場好睇既波,仲有益心身啦。 中國女排果然發威,打低荷蘭。記著睇下一場冠軍之戰呀 ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • hongkonger發表於 2016-8-19 06:38 PM
  • #115
  • "But I will standby my words about this legal principle."
    "MOTIVE is always an important factor in sentencing" is a Legal Principle????
    I think someone's head has gone "The BFG", I don't even bother try to explain the fallacy of this so-called Legal Principle, because it is not worth my time to educate a LIAR.

  • 引用 #101 ctang8 發表於 2016-8-18 11:50 PM

    回覆 hongkonger I know about upholding promises and standing-by words. Since I will not make th ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • hongkonger發表於 2016-8-19 06:32 PM
  • #114
  • "Since I will not make the judgement on the case of HKSAR v 7 black policemen"
    Funny we have a very recent post#89 from this poster
    "C) if you are really serious about quoting court case, you should find out the really names. I presume there is no defendant called the 7 BLACK POLICEMEN.'
    I guess that his preaching in #89 has slipped his memory, oh dear!

  • 引用 #101 ctang8 發表於 2016-8-18 11:50 PM

    回覆 hongkonger I know about upholding promises and standing-by words. Since I will not make th ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • hongkonger發表於 2016-8-19 06:25 PM
  • #113
  • "Since I will not make the judgement on the case of HKSAR v 7 black policemen"
    ---I nearly fell on the floor when I saw this statement from this now-turned-silent poster, who we had saw countless times on this forum, blasted the 7 policemen of acts yet to be decided by the court. If one cares to search the past articles of Miss Wut, one can find all these posts from this poster.
    The fact that his funny label "7 BLACK policemen" is testament to his hatred to these accused.
    I can think no other noun to describe this poster except the four lettered word--------------LIAR and a very incompetent one too!

  • 引用 #101 ctang8 發表於 2016-8-18 11:50 PM

    回覆 hongkonger I know about upholding promises and standing-by words. Since I will not make th ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • hongkonger發表於 2016-8-19 06:15 PM
  • 該回應已被刪除。
  • 路人乙發表於 2016-8-19 12:11 PM via mobile
  • #111
  • ....冷暖氣....
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 路人乙發表於 2016-8-19 12:10 PM via mobile
  • #110
  • 亞老伯,

    話你 out 晒,係對既。

    國內而家90%以上家用空調机已全部冷暖氯係標準設備,你想揾架淨冷都几難。

  • 引用 #108 ctang8 發表於 2016-8-19 12:04 PM

    香港用暖氣?乙類老人罷。
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • ctang8發表於 2016-8-19 12:04 PM
  • #109
  • 香港用暖氣?乙類老人罷。
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 路人乙發表於 2016-8-19 11:34 AM via mobile
  • #108
  • 回覆 #105 ctang8


    唉,亞老伯,尼d咁濕碎既野,如果吾係你提起先,我都費事講。

    你係咪老眼分花呀,我寫既係分體冷暖氣,乜你冬天仲用緊又熱又乾燥既电熱器既咩?
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 路人乙發表於 2016-8-19 11:27 AM via mobile
  • #107
  • 回覆 #100 hongkonger


    睇場好睇既波,仲有益心身啦。

    中國女排果然發威,打低荷蘭。記著睇下一場冠軍之戰呀 Hongkonger !
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • ctang8發表於 2016-8-19 11:20 AM
  • #106
  • 只以有分體冷氣為榮的乙類。膚淺無知。
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 路人乙發表於 2016-8-19 09:44 AM via mobile
  • #105
  • 回覆 #100 hongkonger


    先睇中國女排對荷蘭,費事采尼個 Simple and naive 既阿伯啦 !
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • ctang8發表於 2016-8-19 12:10 AM
  • #103
  • 回覆 #100 hongkonger


    You really should read a book called MY DYSLEXIA by Philip Schultz. I suppose your dyslexia is not too serious to read the title of the book.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • ctang8發表於 2016-8-18 11:50 PM
  • #102
  • 回覆 #98 hongkonger


    I know about upholding promises and standing-by words.

    Since I will not make the judgement on the case of HKSAR v 7 black policemen, I simply have no mean to uphold the statement. But I will standby my words about this legal principle.

    Forget one point in my lesson summary for you - don't use V to separate the plaintiff and defendant in a case name. Use v instead. You are probably misread all these case names in all the papers that you have read. Telling a V from a v is probably very difficult for a dyslexic person.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • hongkonger發表於 2016-8-18 11:46 PM
  • #101
  • "Then, you will say X v HKSAR is wrongly put because of my dyslexia."
    "MY" dyslexia???
    Dyslexia again?
    You truly need a very very long rest, this dyslexia of yours is getting worse as the day draws to an end.
    Bon nuit.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • ctang8發表於 2016-8-18 11:39 PM
  • #100
  • 回覆 #97 hongkonger


    Don't want the homework? OK.

    Next time when you quote a criminal case of HK, you know by now it is in the form of HKSAR v X or X v HKSAR. Then, you will say X v HKSAR is wrongly put because of my dyslexia. If you do have some brain cells left, you will know that is correct.

    Oh, I almost forget - please don't use the object of the previous phrase as the plaintiff of a case if your can overcome your dyslexia.

    That is a very fruitful legal discussion for YOU. Bonsoir..
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • hongkonger發表於 2016-8-18 11:39 PM
  • #99
  • (HOW TO UPHOLD WORDS??????)
    Very seldomly I have to repeat the words of a poster THREE times in my post, but in my post#63--"MOTIVE is always an important factor in sentencing" is repeated again and again and again.
    I have attached particular importance to this statement uttered by this poster, so much that I have unconsciously treated this statement as a core value to be UPHELD.
    However, this poster has shown us what modesty means by example, he declined and refused my flattery and did not want this important statement of his to be upheld.
    In fact, he has shown us this virtue, modesty, should be upheld in future---Don't attach any importance to HIS WORDS!
    I am truly impressed!

  • 引用 #67 ctang8 發表於 2016-8-18 08:53 AM

    'We ARE waitING anxiously FOR the judgement OF the trial of THE "Pan-democrats Social Worker who HA ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • hongkonger發表於 2016-8-18 11:14 PM
  • #98
  • We learn the label "7 black policemen" from you, a very funny label if you ask me, because the first time I saw this, I was totally confused, 7 BLACK(colour) policemen?!
    But of course from a learned person with more knowledge in law and China than the rest of us, we should humbly accepted whatever colours you bestowed on any policemen.
    Next time there may be a court case in USA involving 7 black black policemen(the first black means the colour black, the second black is your peculiar meaning)
    I hope that my "dyslexia", which erupts when reading your posts, will improve by then, because I can't take any more black(I mean coffee this time).

  • 引用 #96 ctang8 發表於 2016-8-18 10:55 PM

    回覆 hongkonger Of course, you cannot face your hilarious statement anymore. "..he DID POUR odor ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 只看作者回應
  • 查看全部回應
  • 順序
  • 倒序
最緊要健康
精選文章
  • 生活
  • DIVA
  • 健康好人生
專業版
HV2
精裝版
SV2
串流版
IQ 登入
強化版
TQ
強化版
MQ